<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google PR Update On The Way</title>
	<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Koenig</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-900</link>
		<author>Mike Koenig</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>"So what if the update is a little late. You have more time to prepare for it, to get content and gather quality links. So, itâ€™s not a bad thing this delay, itâ€™s in fact a good one. At least from my point of view"

They have already taken the snapshot and updated the DCs. Whatever you get now doesn't matter "visually" untill the next update.

I think they implemented TrustRank (google it) and one of the criteria is that a page must be so many months old before it shows pr. 

The only pages showing rank are those that had prior rank. Just my 3 cents on the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So what if the update is a little late. You have more time to prepare for it, to get content and gather quality links. So, itâ€™s not a bad thing this delay, itâ€™s in fact a good one. At least from my point of view&#8221;</p>
<p>They have already taken the snapshot and updated the DCs. Whatever you get now doesn&#8217;t matter &#8220;visually&#8221; untill the next update.</p>
<p>I think they implemented TrustRank (google it) and one of the criteria is that a page must be so many months old before it shows pr. </p>
<p>The only pages showing rank are those that had prior rank. Just my 3 cents on the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vukadinovic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-899</link>
		<author>Daniel Vukadinovic</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mike. This is exactly what I though when hundreds of blogs wrote about the delay. I have a pretty young blog which started just before the PR update supposed to occur and I thought "oh snap, I'll have to wait for whole three to four months to get a PR" but I didn't stop building my backlinks and now it's paying off. More the PR update delays more chances I have to get a decent PR so this is a plus for me :) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mike. This is exactly what I though when hundreds of blogs wrote about the delay. I have a pretty young blog which started just before the PR update supposed to occur and I thought &#8220;oh snap, I&#8217;ll have to wait for whole three to four months to get a PR&#8221; but I didn&#8217;t stop building my backlinks and now it&#8217;s paying off. More the PR update delays more chances I have to get a decent PR so this is a plus for me <img src='http://marketfederation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-898</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>So what if the update is a little late. You have more time to prepare for it, to get content and gather quality links. So, it's not a bad thing this delay, it's in fact a good one. At least from my point of view</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if the update is a little late. You have more time to prepare for it, to get content and gather quality links. So, it&#8217;s not a bad thing this delay, it&#8217;s in fact a good one. At least from my point of view</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vukadinovic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-896</link>
		<author>Daniel Vukadinovic</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-896</guid>
		<description>I wanted to write about it today :). The longest pause between PR updates was 122days and we're not yet to break the record so we can just hope it's going to be soon (I mean the Update).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to write about it today :). The longest pause between PR updates was 122days and we&#8217;re not yet to break the record so we can just hope it&#8217;s going to be soon (I mean the Update).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Koenig</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-894</link>
		<author>Mike Koenig</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>I'm beginning to wonder if it will ever update this time? Aug 20th and no Toolbar update yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if it will ever update this time? Aug 20th and no Toolbar update yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vukadinovic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-548</link>
		<author>Daniel Vukadinovic</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Virat Shah: I think Google PageRank has already been updated. Many people have reported changes in their PR. I'll have to wait for another update :) but I don't worry because I really don't care about the PR which is so overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virat Shah: I think Google PageRank has already been updated. Many people have reported changes in their PR. I&#8217;ll have to wait for another update <img src='http://marketfederation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> but I don&#8217;t worry because I really don&#8217;t care about the PR which is so overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virat Shah</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-546</link>
		<author>Virat Shah</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>ooo...
I am so nervous about www.yphost.com 's PR...
I really have done a lot of hard work for it..i hope i get a high PR
CHEERS for sharing this info mate..!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooo&#8230;<br />
I am so nervous about <a href="http://www.yphost.com" rel="nofollow">www.yphost.com</a> &#8217;s PR&#8230;<br />
I really have done a lot of hard work for it..i hope i get a high PR<br />
CHEERS for sharing this info mate..!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dotsorg</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-536</link>
		<author>dotsorg</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>During the last PR update, Google also made some changes in fetching the PR, so we at www.Dots.org had to make some changes to our script...
We still see some websites that are unable to check the PR (also from the last PR update), does anybody knows something more on this topic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the last PR update, Google also made some changes in fetching the PR, so we at <a href="http://www.Dots.org" rel="nofollow">www.Dots.org</a> had to make some changes to our script&#8230;<br />
We still see some websites that are unable to check the PR (also from the last PR update), does anybody knows something more on this topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darko Martic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-534</link>
		<author>Darko Martic</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>I supose Google keeps their Pagerank update date in secret to fight those "fake PR" users which redirects their domain names to high PR websites (cached website check).
Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I supose Google keeps their Pagerank update date in secret to fight those &#8220;fake PR&#8221; users which redirects their domain names to high PR websites (cached website check).<br />
Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: china wholesale</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-358</link>
		<author>china wholesale</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>My website received a PR2 update back in April 2007 without a single backlink and at only three months old.

I have updated my blog with nearly 100 post since April last along with about 60 or more backlinks with a PR4 or higher besides I have neglected to use any of the automated backlink generating software even though I have about three to five (including some serious blackhat stuff) sitting as unused on my desktop.

I received a detailed worded reprimand from Google a few months back about techniques that contravenes their Webmasters link acquisition guidelines that warned against the auto generated links that gives an unfair advantage to a few (cheeky) webmasters.

I noticed I received this warning after I spents countless hours visiting and downloading all sorts of rss this and rss that type of seo software that put you ahead of the competition, and at the time of receiving the letter I was running some Google codes as a beta test on my website and at one ocassion came across a css history in the Google webmaster tools area of every single blackhat download page I visited, strange enough all the blackhat pages I visited was documented by Google who at the same will tell you they have proof you are breaking their rules but due to company policy you will never find out how they gather their evidence against you.

Due to this uncertainty (on whether my internet activities are still being monitored) I decided to manually seek out valuable backlinks relevant to my website and blog I have only managed to acquire approximately 200 links so far (a task that has proven quite arduous and time consuming, I wont use any of the auto generators until I have changed my computers along with my adsl service provider) and Iâ€™m wondering whether or not these extra 200 backlinks will have a positive effect on my PR.

Iâ€™m hoping that my website moves to a PR4 in the next update which I have heard by the way will occur somewhere near the end of August 2007.

Well with the 60 backlinks PR4 or better I hope these will show up in the next update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My website received a PR2 update back in April 2007 without a single backlink and at only three months old.</p>
<p>I have updated my blog with nearly 100 post since April last along with about 60 or more backlinks with a PR4 or higher besides I have neglected to use any of the automated backlink generating software even though I have about three to five (including some serious blackhat stuff) sitting as unused on my desktop.</p>
<p>I received a detailed worded reprimand from Google a few months back about techniques that contravenes their Webmasters link acquisition guidelines that warned against the auto generated links that gives an unfair advantage to a few (cheeky) webmasters.</p>
<p>I noticed I received this warning after I spents countless hours visiting and downloading all sorts of rss this and rss that type of seo software that put you ahead of the competition, and at the time of receiving the letter I was running some Google codes as a beta test on my website and at one ocassion came across a css history in the Google webmaster tools area of every single blackhat download page I visited, strange enough all the blackhat pages I visited was documented by Google who at the same will tell you they have proof you are breaking their rules but due to company policy you will never find out how they gather their evidence against you.</p>
<p>Due to this uncertainty (on whether my internet activities are still being monitored) I decided to manually seek out valuable backlinks relevant to my website and blog I have only managed to acquire approximately 200 links so far (a task that has proven quite arduous and time consuming, I wont use any of the auto generators until I have changed my computers along with my adsl service provider) and Iâ€™m wondering whether or not these extra 200 backlinks will have a positive effect on my PR.</p>
<p>Iâ€™m hoping that my website moves to a PR4 in the next update which I have heard by the way will occur somewhere near the end of August 2007.</p>
<p>Well with the 60 backlinks PR4 or better I hope these will show up in the next update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-357</link>
		<author>Stacy</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't noticed any changes on any of my sites except the backlinks on that one datacenter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t noticed any changes on any of my sites except the backlinks on that one datacenter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vukadinovic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-269</link>
		<author>Daniel Vukadinovic</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Some people have reported their PageRank already changed but I haven't noticed any changes on my websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people have reported their PageRank already changed but I haven&#8217;t noticed any changes on my websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-268</link>
		<author>seo</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>page rank updation going.....It may be affected next week
Njoy it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>page rank updation going&#8230;..It may be affected next week<br />
Njoy it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yau</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-266</link>
		<author>yau</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>But this is the last week of july now. Google still has not yet showed the green bar...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this is the last week of july now. Google still has not yet showed the green bar&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-182</link>
		<author>Ray</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>July 2007 pr update started by on 6th July as 17 of my inner pages received pr2 and above.  Last week the fun guide to future pr iw... was blank and was up again with adjusted pr.  Other people have posted on the internet the same as me.

As for a guess every 3 months pr is updated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 2007 pr update started by on 6th July as 17 of my inner pages received pr2 and above.  Last week the fun guide to future pr iw&#8230; was blank and was up again with adjusted pr.  Other people have posted on the internet the same as me.</p>
<p>As for a guess every 3 months pr is updated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vukadinovic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-169</link>
		<author>Daniel Vukadinovic</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>That was a typo. Thank you Matt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a typo. Thank you Matt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-158</link>
		<author>Matt Keegan</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I think you mean the last week of July, not June. Anyway, I am looking at July 27th as the date, almost three months to the date since the previous Google update.

Thanks for the list of updates too. It will be good to compare previous dates to determine a future trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean the last week of July, not June. Anyway, I am looking at July 27th as the date, almost three months to the date since the previous Google update.</p>
<p>Thanks for the list of updates too. It will be good to compare previous dates to determine a future trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlugIM.com</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-144</link>
		<author>PlugIM.com</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/google-pr-update-on-the-way/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google PR Update On The Way...&lt;/strong&gt;

Do you ask yourself whether your PageRank is going to increase, decrease or stay the same?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google PR Update On The Way&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Do you ask yourself whether your PageRank is going to increase, decrease or stay the same?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
