<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duplicate Content Issue - Do You Really Own Your Content?</title>
	<link>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Marketwizard</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2860</link>
		<author>Marketwizard</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2860</guid>
		<description>I think there are other factors as well.  Content was syndicated and reprinted by a site with a much higher PR ranking than the content owner, and the original source always lists right below the higher ranking site with the duplicate content.

http://www.investmentcapitalst.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are other factors as well.  Content was syndicated and reprinted by a site with a much higher PR ranking than the content owner, and the original source always lists right below the higher ranking site with the duplicate content.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.investmentcapitalst.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.investmentcapitalst.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vukadinovic</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2734</link>
		<author>Daniel Vukadinovic</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>First we get to know about proxy hacking and now authority hacking, are there any more holes in Google? I hope it gets fixed with the new hardly expected algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First we get to know about proxy hacking and now authority hacking, are there any more holes in Google? I hope it gets fixed with the new hardly expected algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stari</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2486</link>
		<author>stari</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>google is a god, and god's ways are not necessarily fathomable by simple mortals like us :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google is a god, and god&#8217;s ways are not necessarily fathomable by simple mortals like us <img src='http://marketfederation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theGypsy</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2475</link>
		<author>theGypsy</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff... while it is most certainly true that the 'authority' site will always rule the day in such cases, there is more to 'authority' than simple ToolBar PageRank.

Just like ranking documents is based on more than PR, authority is as well. It is not as simple as assigning to whomever published it first unfortunately. 

One should never distribute content that they intend to use on their own site or as a target page for an SEO campaign. 

A good post though, I don't see enough folks discussing it in tutorial type posts.

Nice one - :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff&#8230; while it is most certainly true that the &#8216;authority&#8217; site will always rule the day in such cases, there is more to &#8216;authority&#8217; than simple ToolBar PageRank.</p>
<p>Just like ranking documents is based on more than PR, authority is as well. It is not as simple as assigning to whomever published it first unfortunately. </p>
<p>One should never distribute content that they intend to use on their own site or as a target page for an SEO campaign. </p>
<p>A good post though, I don&#8217;t see enough folks discussing it in tutorial type posts.</p>
<p>Nice one - :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlugIM.com</title>
		<link>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2473</link>
		<author>PlugIM.com</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marketfederation.com/duplicate-content-issue-do-you-really-own-your-content/#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Duplicate Content Issue - Do You Really Own Your Content?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Those who say PageRank doesnâ€™t matter, you should think again. Perhaps it doesnâ€™t matter to bloggers who donâ€™t profit from their blogs by selling ad spots but thatâ€™s really not their biggest concern, or at least it shouldnâ€™t be. Itâ€™s the du...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Duplicate Content Issue - Do You Really Own Your Content?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Those who say PageRank doesnâ€™t matter, you should think again. Perhaps it doesnâ€™t matter to bloggers who donâ€™t profit from their blogs by selling ad spots but thatâ€™s really not their biggest concern, or at least it shouldnâ€™t be. Itâ€™s the du&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
